Seek Returns logo

AER vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AER’s market capitalization stands at 20.46 billion USD, while EME’s is 24.49 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.40 for AER and 1.23 for EME, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAEREME
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.EMCOR Group, Inc.
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesEngineering & Construction
CEOAengus KellyAnthony J. Guzzi
Price115.89 USD547.22 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD24.49 billion USD
Beta1.401.23
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006January 10, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME

36.90%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

In the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, EME’s Return on Equity of 36.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

EME

26.67%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

EME’s Return on Invested Capital of 26.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EME

7.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.00% places EME in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME

9.36%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.36% places EME in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEREME
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%36.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%13.01%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%26.67%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%7.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%9.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%19.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME

1.16

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME

0.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EME

229.88

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 229.88, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEREME
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.16
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.061.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.690.22
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.08
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.630.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.50229.88

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and EME. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME

0.18%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is consistent with its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME

4.41%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.41% is within the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEREME
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%4.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EME

23.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

EME’s P/E Ratio of 23.95 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

EME

2.47

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EME

1.63

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EME

8.53

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

EME’s P/B Ratio of 8.53 is in the upper tier for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AER vs. EME: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEREME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8523.95
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.332.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.561.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.228.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8018.79
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5415.74
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.221.64