AEP vs. PCG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEP and PCG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AEP at 54.98 billion USD and PCG at 37.53 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.43 for AEP and 0.63 for PCG, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AEP | PCG |
---|---|---|
Company Name | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | PG&E Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
CEO | Mr. William J. Fehrman | Ms. Patricia Kessler Poppe |
Price | 102.93 USD | 17.075 USD |
Market Cap | 54.98 billion USD | 37.53 billion USD |
Beta | 0.43 | 0.63 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | January 2, 1962 | June 1, 1972 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEP and PCG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEP and PCG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AEP has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -42.33, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, PCG (P/FCF 5.16) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
Symbol | AEP | PCG |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.86 | 15.55 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 1.81 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.73 | 1.53 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.01 | 1.04 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -42.33 | 5.16 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.99 | 10.05 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.04 | 3.97 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -78.25 | 13.40 |
Dividend Comparison
AEP’s dividend yield of 3.57% is about 770% higher than PCG’s 0.41%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | AEP | PCG |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.57% | 0.41% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEP and PCG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.42 and 0.95, both AEP and PCG have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AEP’s quick ratio of 0.31 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas PCG at 0.90 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
Symbol | AEP | PCG |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.95 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.31 | 0.90 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 1.66 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.45 | 0.44 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.30 | 1.43 |