AEM vs. X: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEM and X, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AEM dominates in value with a market cap of 58.46 billion USD, eclipsing X’s 9.51 billion USD by roughly 6.14×.
X carries a higher beta at 1.82, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM remains steadier at 0.53.
| Symbol | AEM | X |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | United States Steel Corporation |
| Country | CA | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Gold | Steel |
| CEO | Mr. Ammar Al-Joundi M.B.A., P.Eng. | Mr. Alan Kestenbaum |
| Price | 115.63 USD | 42.02 USD |
| Market Cap | 58.46 billion USD | 9.51 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.53 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | April 12, 1991 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEM and X over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEM and X based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AEM posts a negative forward PEG of -4.30, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas X at 2.35 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- X reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -6.64, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AEM at 25.14 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AEM | X |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.54 | 97.75 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -4.30 | 2.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.54 | 0.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.68 | 0.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.14 | -6.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 11.32 | 8.59 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.55 | 0.60 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.20 | -6.33 |
Dividend Comparison
AEM’s dividend yield of 1.38% is about 191% higher than X’s 0.48%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AEM | X |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.38% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEM and X, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- X posts a quick ratio of 0.75, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AEM at 1.20 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AEM meets its interest obligations (ratio 45.23). In stark contrast, X’s negative ratio (-4.86) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AEM | X |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.20 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 45.23 | -4.86 |