Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEM’s market capitalization of 60.70 billion USD is substantially larger than SUZ’s 11.85 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.50 for AEM and 0.44 for SUZ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SUZ is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AEM, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAEMSUZ
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedSuzano S.A.
CountryCABR
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldPaper, Lumber & Forest Products
CEOAmmar Al-JoundiJoão Alberto Fernandez de Abreu
Price120.06 USD9.57 USD
Market Cap60.70 billion USD11.85 billion USD
Beta0.500.44
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 1972November 4, 2008
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEM

11.41%

Gold Industry

Max
25.86%
Q3
12.48%
Median
8.15%
Q1
2.34%
Min
-3.82%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 11.41% is on par with the norm for the Gold industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ

-2.49%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
32.48%
Q3
23.55%
Median
11.68%
Q1
-1.23%
Min
-2.49%

SUZ has a negative Return on Equity of -2.49%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEM

8.50%

Gold Industry

Max
20.84%
Q3
9.90%
Median
5.11%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.62%

AEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.50% is in line with the norm for the Gold industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

SUZ

3.61%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.55%
Q3
12.45%
Median
3.61%
Q1
-0.60%
Min
-1.21%

SUZ’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.61% is in line with the norm for the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEM

26.48%

Gold Industry

Max
26.48%
Q3
21.01%
Median
16.48%
Q1
8.22%
Min
-6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.48% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SUZ

-1.92%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.83%
Median
5.64%
Q1
-0.94%
Min
-1.92%

SUZ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEM

41.82%

Gold Industry

Max
67.43%
Q3
40.39%
Median
30.64%
Q1
19.83%
Min
-9.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.82% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SUZ

31.11%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
14.20%
Median
6.83%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-20.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.11% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)11.41%-2.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.74%-0.61%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.50%3.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%-1.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.82%31.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.06%40.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEM

2.37

Gold Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.76
Median
2.34
Q1
1.51
Min
0.52

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ

2.61

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.04
Q3
2.83
Median
2.38
Q1
1.88
Min
1.64

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 2.61 aligns with the median group of the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEM

0.06

Gold Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.34
Median
0.17
Q1
0.06
Min
0.00

AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUZ

2.55

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.77
Q3
1.72
Median
0.35
Q1
0.15
Min
0.03

SUZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEM

45.23

Gold Industry

Max
45.23
Q3
25.79
Median
13.44
Q1
2.91
Min
-6.26

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.23 is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SUZ

2.62

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
47.13
Q3
26.04
Median
2.62
Q1
0.26
Min
-5.53

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Current Ratio (TTM)2.372.61
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.201.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.062.55
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.63
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.0322.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.232.62

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEM and SUZ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEM

1.33%

Gold Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 1.33% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SUZ

3.88%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
5.73%
Q3
3.75%
Median
1.79%
Q1
1.30%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.88%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEM

29.17%

Gold Industry

Max
110.70%
Q3
42.09%
Median
15.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.17% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUZ

-33.22%

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
5,100.00%
Q3
23.78%
Median
21.93%
Q1
18.56%
Min
0.00%

SUZ has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -33.22%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.33%3.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.17%-33.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEM

25.48

Gold Industry

Max
64.00
Q3
46.06
Median
29.03
Q1
16.74
Min
1.00

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 25.48 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SUZ

-67.82

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.23
Q3
16.23
Median
15.20
Q1
7.25
Min
2.65

SUZ has a negative P/E Ratio of -67.82. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEM

-3.79

Gold Industry

Max
14.01
Q3
6.52
Median
3.33
Q1
0.82
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

SUZ

0.68

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
0.94
Q3
0.92
Median
0.76
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEM

6.79

Gold Industry

Max
15.12
Q3
7.63
Median
3.25
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SUZ

1.30

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.08
Q3
1.11
Median
0.91
Q1
0.41
Min
0.19

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 is in the upper echelon for the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEM

2.79

Gold Industry

Max
6.10
Q3
3.60
Median
2.02
Q1
1.35
Min
0.26

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.79 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SUZ

1.68

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.07
Median
1.65
Q1
0.86
Min
0.55

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.68 is within the conventional range for the Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Paper, Lumber & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)25.48-67.82
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-3.790.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.791.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.791.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)26.109.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.7639.37
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.803.08