Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AEM is a standard domestic listing, while SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAEMSUZ
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedSuzano S.A.
CountryCanadaBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization84.55 billion USD11.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973November 4, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
5-Day Price Return0.25%1.41%
13-Week Price Return28.70%-9.96%
26-Week Price Return58.58%-11.76%
52-Week Price Return116.06%-20.24%
Month-to-Date Return4.63%-3.13%
Year-to-Date Return109.87%-23.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.90M6.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M4.74M
3-Month Volatility38.54%17.78%
Beta0.98-0.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AEM

15.58%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 15.58% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
5.87%
Q3
5.46%
Median
3.93%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-3.59%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

32.62%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.62% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
17.13%
Q3
10.06%
Median
3.43%
Q1
1.25%
Min
-4.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

49.46%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 49.46% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
14.51%
Median
6.22%
Q1
2.45%
Min
-5.63%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)15.58%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.04%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)49.46%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.29%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

2.12

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.12 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.98
Median
1.39
Q1
1.23
Min
1.07

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

0.01

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
0.91
Q3
0.80
Median
0.52
Q1
0.28
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AEM

13.07

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
3.20
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.123.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.222.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.012.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.070.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AEM vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AEM

0.85%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SUZ

4.24%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.31%
Q3
4.17%
Median
2.46%
Q1
2.21%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.24%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AEM

20.78%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.78% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
313.62%
Q3
193.66%
Median
83.21%
Q1
30.97%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%4.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.78%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AEM

24.52

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 24.52 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SUZ

7.58

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
34.02
Q3
24.22
Median
19.50
Q1
11.97
Min
7.58

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 7.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AEM

8.00

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 8.00 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SUZ

1.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.30
Median
0.86
Q1
0.54
Min
0.41

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

3.91

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 3.91 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.25
Median
0.84
Q1
0.70
Min
0.28

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AEM vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.527.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.001.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.911.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.1910.30