Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. MOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and MOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEM’s market capitalization of 60.70 billion USD is substantially larger than MOS’s 11.82 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

MOS carries a higher beta at 1.15, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM (beta: 0.50) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAEMMOS
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedThe Mosaic Company
CountryCAUS
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldAgricultural Inputs
CEOAmmar Al-JoundiBruce M. Bodine Jr.
Price120.06 USD37.27 USD
Market Cap60.70 billion USD11.82 billion USD
Beta0.501.15
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 1972January 26, 1988
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and MOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. MOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEM

11.41%

Gold Industry

Max
25.86%
Q3
12.48%
Median
8.15%
Q1
2.34%
Min
-3.82%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 11.41% is on par with the norm for the Gold industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MOS

3.15%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
7.27%
Q3
7.27%
Median
4.65%
Q1
2.14%
Min
2.14%

MOS’s Return on Equity of 3.15% is on par with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEM

8.50%

Gold Industry

Max
20.84%
Q3
9.90%
Median
5.11%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.62%

AEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.50% is in line with the norm for the Gold industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MOS

2.30%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
9.49%
Median
5.13%
Q1
2.30%
Min
1.24%

MOS’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.30% is in line with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEM

26.48%

Gold Industry

Max
26.48%
Q3
21.01%
Median
16.48%
Q1
8.22%
Min
-6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.48% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MOS

3.32%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
13.95%
Q3
7.95%
Median
5.66%
Q1
2.06%
Min
1.04%

MOS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEM

41.82%

Gold Industry

Max
67.43%
Q3
40.39%
Median
30.64%
Q1
19.83%
Min
-9.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.82% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MOS

7.11%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
23.04%
Q3
14.70%
Median
11.01%
Q1
7.11%
Min
3.65%

MOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.11% is around the midpoint for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMMOS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.41%3.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.74%1.59%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.50%2.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%3.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.82%7.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.06%14.47%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEM

2.37

Gold Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.76
Median
2.34
Q1
1.51
Min
0.52

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MOS

1.12

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.50
Median
1.54
Q1
1.44
Min
1.12

MOS’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEM

0.06

Gold Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.34
Median
0.17
Q1
0.06
Min
0.00

AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MOS

0.41

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
0.91
Q3
0.65
Median
0.42
Q1
0.29
Min
0.01

MOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEM

45.23

Gold Industry

Max
45.23
Q3
25.79
Median
13.44
Q1
2.91
Min
-6.26

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.23 is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MOS

3.51

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
4.73
Median
3.51
Q1
1.95
Min
1.30

MOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.51 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMMOS
Current Ratio (TTM)2.371.12
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.200.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.41
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.032.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.233.51

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEM and MOS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEM

1.33%

Gold Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 1.33% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MOS

2.31%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
8.05%
Q3
5.41%
Median
3.73%
Q1
2.20%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Yield of 2.31% is consistent with its peers in the Agricultural Inputs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEM

29.17%

Gold Industry

Max
110.70%
Q3
42.09%
Median
15.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.17% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MOS

73.93%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
424.10%
Q3
73.93%
Median
66.58%
Q1
26.42%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.93% is within the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMMOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.33%2.31%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.17%73.93%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEM

25.48

Gold Industry

Max
64.00
Q3
46.06
Median
29.03
Q1
16.74
Min
1.00

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 25.48 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MOS

32.12

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
53.97
Q3
47.01
Median
26.38
Q1
15.38
Min
11.48

MOS’s P/E Ratio of 32.12 is within the middle range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEM

-3.79

Gold Industry

Max
14.01
Q3
6.52
Median
3.33
Q1
0.82
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

MOS

-47.48

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
6.44
Q3
5.70
Median
2.87
Q1
1.84
Min
0.52

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Agricultural Inputs industry.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEM

6.79

Gold Industry

Max
15.12
Q3
7.63
Median
3.25
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MOS

1.07

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
2.41
Q3
1.73
Median
1.30
Q1
1.11
Min
1.01

In the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry, MOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.07 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEM

2.79

Gold Industry

Max
6.10
Q3
3.60
Median
2.02
Q1
1.35
Min
0.26

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.79 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MOS

1.00

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
3.21
Q3
2.35
Median
1.36
Q1
1.13
Min
0.95

MOS’s P/B Ratio of 1.00 is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AEM vs. MOS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMMOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)25.4832.12
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-3.79-47.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.791.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.791.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)26.1055.64
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.768.71
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.801.48