Seek Returns

AEM vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at AEM and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAEMLIN
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedLinde plc
CountryCanadaUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
GICS Sub-IndustryGoldIndustrial Gases
Market Capitalization98.43 billion USD233.21 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

LIN’s market capitalization (233.21 billion USD) is significantly greater than AEM’s (98.43 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM
LIN
Loading price history…
AEM vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
5-Day Price Return8.07%0.82%
13-Week Price Return1.96%12.53%
26-Week Price Return15.82%22.37%
52-Week Price Return65.72%11.43%
Month-to-Date Return3.54%0.65%
Year-to-Date Return13.63%18.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.79M2.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.00M2.48M
3-Month Volatility50.85%20.14%
Beta2.650.75

AEM’s beta of 2.65 points to significantly higher volatility compared to LIN (beta: 0.75), suggesting AEM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AEM

22.01%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
42.25%
Q3
21.22%
Median
12.20%
Q1
5.06%
Min
-17.83%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AEM’s Return on Equity of 22.01% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN

18.40%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.95%
Q3
10.45%
Median
3.77%
Q1
-7.41%
Min
-33.63%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 18.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

39.46%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
61.01%
Q3
27.39%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-20.48%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.46% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN

20.44%

Chemicals Industry
Max
20.54%
Q3
7.22%
Median
2.51%
Q1
-3.08%
Min
-15.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.44% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

59.07%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
90.15%
Q3
42.76%
Median
19.77%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-39.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 59.07% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

26.48%

Chemicals Industry
Max
32.38%
Q3
12.98%
Median
6.82%
Q1
-1.79%
Min
-14.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.48% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)22.01%18.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.95%8.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.46%20.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)59.07%26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.94%48.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

3.15

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
5.16
Q3
3.14
Median
2.59
Q1
1.75
Min
0.54

AEM’s Current Ratio of 3.15 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LIN

0.83

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.10
Q3
2.55
Median
1.82
Q1
1.35
Min
0.83

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

0.01

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
1.06
Q3
0.50
Median
0.28
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LIN

0.68

Chemicals Industry
Max
2.41
Q3
1.30
Median
0.79
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AEM

13.07

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
42.22
Q3
22.98
Median
6.63
Q1
2.00
Min
-13.32

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN

34.45

Chemicals Industry
Max
15.12
Q3
8.96
Median
2.23
Q1
-0.23
Min
-6.63

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.45, LIN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.150.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.080.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.010.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.0734.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)66.09%8.25%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)51.71%4.96%
3-Year Revenue CAGR27.53%0.62%
5-Year Revenue CAGR30.57%4.52%

EPS Growth

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)108.94%13.37%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)125.93%9.36%
3-Year EPS CAGR79.65%21.09%
5-Year EPS CAGR33.31%25.41%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AEM

0.78%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
2.92%
Q3
1.35%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.22%

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.48%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.04%
Q1
1.02%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AEM

14.15%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
70.98%
Q3
31.99%
Median
15.38%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.15% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.16%

Chemicals Industry
Max
125.87%
Q3
74.70%
Median
40.16%
Q1
21.00%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.16% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%1.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.15%40.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AEM

18.15

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
59.02
Q3
35.81
Median
22.28
Q1
16.40
Min
6.27

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 18.15 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

32.95

Chemicals Industry
Max
73.82
Q3
40.02
Median
29.24
Q1
16.53
Min
12.51

LIN’s P/E Ratio of 32.95 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AEM

7.16

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
11.56
Q3
6.67
Median
3.28
Q1
1.37
Min
0.20

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 7.16 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LIN

6.73

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.43
Q3
2.14
Median
1.15
Q1
0.57
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.73, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

3.94

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
6.56
Q3
4.10
Median
2.78
Q1
1.74
Min
0.41

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 3.94 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.96

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.50
Q3
3.09
Median
1.57
Q1
1.20
Min
0.33

At 5.96, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AEM vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.1532.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.166.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.945.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.4545.79