Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. CRH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and CRH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEM’s market capitalization stands at 60.70 billion USD, while CRH’s is 64.18 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

CRH carries a higher beta at 1.22, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM (beta: 0.50) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAEMCRH
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedCRH plc
CountryCAIE
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldConstruction Materials
CEOAmmar Al-JoundiJim Mintern
Price120.06 USD94.94 USD
Market Cap60.70 billion USD64.18 billion USD
Beta0.501.22
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 1972July 13, 1989
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and CRH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. CRH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEM

11.41%

Gold Industry

Max
25.86%
Q3
12.48%
Median
8.15%
Q1
2.34%
Min
-3.82%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 11.41% is on par with the norm for the Gold industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRH

15.42%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
32.32%
Q3
20.74%
Median
15.42%
Q1
12.55%
Min
11.55%

CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.42% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEM

8.50%

Gold Industry

Max
20.84%
Q3
9.90%
Median
5.11%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.62%

AEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.50% is in line with the norm for the Gold industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CRH

8.38%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
15.45%
Q3
12.02%
Median
9.68%
Q1
7.11%
Min
7.02%

CRH’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.38% is in line with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEM

26.48%

Gold Industry

Max
26.48%
Q3
21.01%
Median
16.48%
Q1
8.22%
Min
-6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.48% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRH

9.19%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
20.50%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.94%
Q1
9.16%
Min
4.73%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEM

41.82%

Gold Industry

Max
67.43%
Q3
40.39%
Median
30.64%
Q1
19.83%
Min
-9.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.82% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRH

13.73%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
26.51%
Q3
22.33%
Median
18.96%
Q1
12.92%
Min
6.22%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMCRH
Return on Equity (TTM)11.41%15.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.74%6.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.50%8.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%9.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.82%13.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.06%35.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEM

2.37

Gold Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.76
Median
2.34
Q1
1.51
Min
0.52

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRH

1.63

Construction Materials Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.73
Median
2.25
Q1
1.63
Min
0.87

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEM

0.06

Gold Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.34
Median
0.17
Q1
0.06
Min
0.00

AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRH

0.80

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.88
Q3
0.71
Median
0.53
Q1
0.21
Min
0.01

CRH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction Materials industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEM

45.23

Gold Industry

Max
45.23
Q3
25.79
Median
13.44
Q1
2.91
Min
-6.26

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.23 is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CRH

7.45

Construction Materials Industry

Max
32.44
Q3
18.11
Median
7.75
Q1
5.31
Min
3.30

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMCRH
Current Ratio (TTM)2.371.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.201.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.032.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.237.45

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEM and CRH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEM

1.33%

Gold Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 1.33% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRH

1.51%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
8.35%
Q3
1.57%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.22%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.51% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEM

29.17%

Gold Industry

Max
110.70%
Q3
42.09%
Median
15.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.17% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRH

29.07%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
86.74%
Q3
26.48%
Median
13.85%
Q1
4.99%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.07% is in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMCRH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.33%1.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.17%29.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEM

25.48

Gold Industry

Max
64.00
Q3
46.06
Median
29.03
Q1
16.74
Min
1.00

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 25.48 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRH

19.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
37.00
Q3
25.95
Median
18.83
Q1
14.75
Min
6.99

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 19.53 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEM

-3.79

Gold Industry

Max
14.01
Q3
6.52
Median
3.33
Q1
0.82
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

CRH

1.81

Construction Materials Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
2.21
Median
1.91
Q1
1.46
Min
0.48

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Construction Materials industry.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEM

6.79

Gold Industry

Max
15.12
Q3
7.63
Median
3.25
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRH

1.79

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.00
Q3
3.98
Median
2.34
Q1
1.52
Min
0.50

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEM

2.79

Gold Industry

Max
6.10
Q3
3.60
Median
2.02
Q1
1.35
Min
0.26

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.79 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRH

3.04

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.60
Q3
4.69
Median
3.33
Q1
1.80
Min
0.76

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 3.04 is within the conventional range for the Construction Materials industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AEM vs. CRH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMCRH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)25.4819.53
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-3.791.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.791.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.793.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)26.1027.60
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.7611.93
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.802.17