Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. CF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and CF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEM’s market capitalization of 60.70 billion USD is substantially larger than CF’s 15.33 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

CF carries a higher beta at 0.95, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM (beta: 0.50) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAEMCF
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedCF Industries Holdings, Inc.
CountryCAUS
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldAgricultural Inputs
CEOAmmar Al-JoundiW. Anthony Will
Price120.06 USD94.65 USD
Market Cap60.70 billion USD15.33 billion USD
Beta0.500.95
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 1972August 11, 2005
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and CF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. CF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEM

11.41%

Gold Industry

Max
25.86%
Q3
12.48%
Median
8.15%
Q1
2.34%
Min
-3.82%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 11.41% is on par with the norm for the Gold industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CF

26.17%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
7.27%
Q3
7.27%
Median
4.65%
Q1
2.14%
Min
2.14%

CF’s Return on Equity of 26.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEM

8.50%

Gold Industry

Max
20.84%
Q3
9.90%
Median
5.11%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.62%

AEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.50% is in line with the norm for the Gold industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CF

9.49%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
9.49%
Median
5.13%
Q1
2.30%
Min
1.24%

CF’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.49% is in line with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEM

26.48%

Gold Industry

Max
26.48%
Q3
21.01%
Median
16.48%
Q1
8.22%
Min
-6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.48% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CF

21.80%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
13.95%
Q3
7.95%
Median
5.66%
Q1
2.06%
Min
1.04%

CF’s Net Profit Margin of 21.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEM

41.82%

Gold Industry

Max
67.43%
Q3
40.39%
Median
30.64%
Q1
19.83%
Min
-9.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.82% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CF

23.04%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
23.04%
Q3
14.70%
Median
11.01%
Q1
7.11%
Min
3.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places CF in the upper quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMCF
Return on Equity (TTM)11.41%26.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.74%10.04%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)8.50%9.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%21.80%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.82%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.06%36.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEM

2.37

Gold Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.76
Median
2.34
Q1
1.51
Min
0.52

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CF

2.59

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.50
Median
1.54
Q1
1.44
Min
1.12

CF’s Current Ratio of 2.59 is in the upper quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEM

0.06

Gold Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.34
Median
0.17
Q1
0.06
Min
0.00

AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CF

0.69

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
0.91
Q3
0.65
Median
0.42
Q1
0.29
Min
0.01

CF’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Agricultural Inputs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEM

45.23

Gold Industry

Max
45.23
Q3
25.79
Median
13.44
Q1
2.91
Min
-6.26

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.23 is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CF

11.87

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
4.73
Median
3.51
Q1
1.95
Min
1.30

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.87, CF demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMCF
Current Ratio (TTM)2.372.59
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.202.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.69
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.25
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.030.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.2311.87

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEM and CF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEM

1.33%

Gold Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 1.33% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CF

2.11%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
8.05%
Q3
5.41%
Median
3.73%
Q1
2.20%
Min
0.00%

CF’s Dividend Yield of 2.11% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEM

29.17%

Gold Industry

Max
110.70%
Q3
42.09%
Median
15.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.17% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CF

26.42%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
424.10%
Q3
73.93%
Median
66.58%
Q1
26.42%
Min
0.00%

CF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.42% is within the typical range for the Agricultural Inputs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMCF
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.33%2.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.17%26.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEM

25.48

Gold Industry

Max
64.00
Q3
46.06
Median
29.03
Q1
16.74
Min
1.00

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 25.48 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CF

11.94

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
53.97
Q3
47.01
Median
26.38
Q1
15.38
Min
11.48

In the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry, CF’s P/E Ratio of 11.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEM

-3.79

Gold Industry

Max
14.01
Q3
6.52
Median
3.33
Q1
0.82
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

CF

6.70

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
6.44
Q3
5.70
Median
2.87
Q1
1.84
Min
0.52

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Agricultural Inputs industry.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEM

6.79

Gold Industry

Max
15.12
Q3
7.63
Median
3.25
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CF

2.50

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
2.41
Q3
1.73
Median
1.30
Q1
1.11
Min
1.01

With a P/S Ratio of 2.50, CF trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Agricultural Inputs industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEM

2.79

Gold Industry

Max
6.10
Q3
3.60
Median
2.02
Q1
1.35
Min
0.26

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.79 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CF

3.34

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max
3.21
Q3
2.35
Median
1.36
Q1
1.13
Min
0.95

At 3.34, CF’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Agricultural Inputs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AEM vs. CF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMCF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)25.4811.94
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-3.796.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.792.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.793.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)26.108.24
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)11.767.84
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.802.81