AEE vs. NI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEE and NI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AEE (26.70 billion USD) and NI (18.29 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
AEE at 0.52 and NI at 0.54 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Symbol | AEE | NI |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Ameren Corporation | NiSource Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Gas |
CEO | Mr. Martin J. Lyons Jr. | Mr. Lloyd M. Yates |
Price | 96.5 USD | 38.85 USD |
Market Cap | 26.70 billion USD | 18.29 billion USD |
Beta | 0.524 | 0.535 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | January 2, 1998 | December 16, 1962 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEE and NI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEE and NI based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both AEE at -14.73 and NI at -26.83 have negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow values. This reveals they’ve been consuming more cash than they generate over the past year—a persistent cash drain that could strain their ability to operate without external funding.
Symbol | AEE | NI |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.53 | 21.00 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.89 | 2.64 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.38 | 3.08 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.13 | 2.05 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -14.73 | -26.83 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 7.45 | 12.00 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.38 | 5.55 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -14.72 | -48.29 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AEE at 2.82% and NI at 2.81% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
Symbol | AEE | NI |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.82% | 2.81% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEE and NI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For both AEE (0.86) and NI (0.52), current ratios sit below 1. With current assets trailing short-term liabilities, they might tap into cash flow or borrowing to stay afloat—a setup not uncommon in certain sectors, though it bears monitoring if cash gets tight.
- AEE (0.62) and NI (0.45) both clock quick ratios under 0.8. Without inventory, their liquid assets don’t match short-term debts, so they might lean on sales or loans to cover the difference—doable if cash keeps flowing.
Symbol | AEE | NI |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.52 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.62 | 0.45 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.67 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.45 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.30 | 3.07 |