Seek Returns logo

ADSK vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADSK and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADSKZM
Company NameAutodesk, Inc.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization61.75 billion USD21.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 28, 1985April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADSK and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADSK vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
5-Day Price Return1.72%0.42%
13-Week Price Return-2.46%-13.38%
26-Week Price Return-4.89%-15.27%
52-Week Price Return14.94%20.63%
Month-to-Date Return-4.78%-2.55%
Year-to-Date Return-2.35%-11.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.52M2.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.50M2.64M
3-Month Volatility25.69%21.48%
Beta1.500.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADSK

39.19%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, ADSK’s Return on Equity of 39.19% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZM

11.97%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADSK

15.94%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

ADSK’s Net Profit Margin of 15.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZM

22.31%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADSK

20.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ADSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.29% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZM

18.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Return on Equity (TTM)39.19%11.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.75%9.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.94%22.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.29%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)90.53%75.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADSK

0.65

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ADSK’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ZM

4.57

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADSK

0.87

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ADSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.87 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADSK

18.20

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ADSK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.654.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.524.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.870.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.207.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADSK vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADSK vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADSK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADSK

61.00

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ADSK’s P/E Ratio of 61.00 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

21.69

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADSK

9.73

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ADSK’s P/S Ratio of 9.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZM

4.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADSK

22.42

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ADSK’s P/B Ratio of 22.42 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZM

2.66

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)61.0021.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.734.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.422.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.5613.36