Seek Returns logo

ADSK vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADSK and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ADSK’s market capitalization of 67.75 billion USD is substantially larger than ZM’s 23.77 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ADSK’s beta of 1.45 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ZM (beta: 0.69), suggesting ADSK has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolADSKZM
Company NameAutodesk, Inc.Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
CEOAndrew AnagnostEric S. Yuan
Price316.66 USD78.58 USD
Market Cap67.75 billion USD23.77 billion USD
Beta1.450.69
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 28, 1985April 18, 2019
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADSK and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADSK vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ADSK

45.55%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, ADSK’s Return on Equity of 45.55% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZM

11.97%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their ROE against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ADSK

16.53%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, ADSK’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.53% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ZM

6.71%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

ZM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.71% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their ROIC against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ADSK

18.53%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.53% places ADSK in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZM

22.31%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ADSK

20.29%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.29% places ADSK in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZM

16.57%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.57% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Return on Equity (TTM)45.55%11.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.11%9.57%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)16.53%6.71%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.53%22.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.29%16.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)90.53%75.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ADSK

0.65

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ADSK’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ZM

4.48

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ADSK

0.90

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ADSK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Application industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZM

0.01

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ADSK

184.00

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 184.00, ADSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software - Application industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ZM

--

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZM is currently unavailable.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Current Ratio (TTM)0.654.48
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.654.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.900.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.220.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.35-1.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)184.00--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ADSK and ZM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ADSK

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADSK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ADSK

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ADSK

57.62

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ADSK’s P/E Ratio of 57.62 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

22.85

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

ZM’s P/E Ratio of 22.85 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ADSK

4.33

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

ADSK’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.33 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ZM

9.68

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 9.68 places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ADSK

10.67

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ADSK’s P/S Ratio of 10.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZM

5.06

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ADSK

25.89

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ZM

2.69

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ADSK vs. ZM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Software - Application industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADSKZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)57.6222.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.339.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)10.675.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)25.892.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)42.1813.96
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)45.7021.36
EV-to-Sales (TTM)10.764.81