ADSK vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
PANW stands out with 120.01 billion USD in market value—about 1.91× ADSK’s market cap of 62.67 billion USD.
With betas of 1.47 for ADSK and 1.02 for PANW, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ADSK | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 181.26 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.02 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | July 20, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PANW shows a negative forward PEG of -0.95, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ADSK at 4.08 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ADSK | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 95.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | -0.95 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 14.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 18.74 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 40.33 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 78.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 13.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor PANW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADSK | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.68 and 0.84, both ADSK and PANW have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas PANW at 0.84 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ADSK shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas PANW (at 591.06) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ADSK | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.14 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 591.06 |