ADSK vs. NET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and NET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK (62.67 billion USD) and NET (54.25 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
ADSK at 1.47 and NET at 1.78 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ADSK | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Cloudflare, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Matthew Prince J.D. |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 156.52 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 54.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.473 | 1.785 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | September 13, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and NET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and NET based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- NET shows a negative P/E of -662.24, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ADSK at 56.64 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
| Symbol | ADSK | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | -662.24 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 6.62 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 30.65 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 37.95 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 294.56 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 627.17 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 31.37 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 301.47 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor NET pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ADSK | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and NET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK posts a current ratio of 0.68 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to NET, sitting at 3.20, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- ADSK’s quick ratio sits at 0.68 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, NET lands at 3.20, with enough liquidity to spare.
- ADSK’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while NET at -27.68 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
| Symbol | ADSK | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 3.20 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 3.20 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.40 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -27.68 |