ADSK vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ADSK’s market capitalization stands at 62.51 billion USD, while MRVL’s is 57.93 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.45 for ADSK and 1.76 for MRVL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ADSK and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of ADSK and MRVL. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• ADSK’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 53.17 is very high, indicating its stock trades at a significant premium to its earnings, possibly due to strong investor sentiment or high growth expectations. MRVL’s P/E ratio of -118.22 is negative, signaling it is currently unprofitable.
• ADSK’s Forward PEG ratio of 3.99 is very high, suggesting its stock might be overvalued if its price has substantially outrun its future earnings growth forecast. MRVL’s Forward PEG ratio of -7.77 is negative, often an indicator of issues such as negative current earnings or anticipated earnings contraction, which calls its fundamental valuation into question.

Dividend Comparison

ADSK currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MRVL provides a 0.36% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of ADSK and MRVL. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• ADSK’s current ratio of 0.65 is considered low. This may signal potential challenges with its short-term liquidity, implying that its current assets might offer a limited buffer for meeting its immediate debts and could affect its capacity to smoothly manage upcoming financial duties.
• ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.65 is low. This suggests potential difficulty in meeting its immediate financial responsibilities with its most liquid assets (excluding inventory), possibly indicating a greater dependence on inventory turnover to service short-term debts.
• MRVL’s Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of 0.21 is critically low. This indicates that its margin of safety for covering interest payments is very narrow, suggesting potential difficulties in meeting these obligations if earnings decrease even slightly.