ADSK vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and IONQ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing IONQ’s 8.31 billion USD by roughly 7.54×.
IONQ carries a higher beta at 2.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ADSK remains steadier at 1.47.
| Symbol | ADSK | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | IonQ, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Niccolo Mcleod de Masi |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 33.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 8.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 2.46 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | January 4, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and IONQ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and IONQ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- IONQ shows a negative P/E of -23.66, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ADSK at 56.64 trades on solid profitability.
- IONQ reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -42.42, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ADSK at 39.99 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ADSK | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | -23.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 8.08 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 193.01 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 10.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | -42.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | -34.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 189.71 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | -41.70 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor IONQ currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADSK | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and IONQ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while IONQ at 13.17 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas IONQ at 12.67 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither ADSK nor IONQ records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ADSK | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 13.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 12.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |