ADSK vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and FTV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing FTV’s 23.83 billion USD by roughly 2.63×.
With betas of 1.47 for ADSK and 1.16 for FTV, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ADSK | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Fortive Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. James A. Lico |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 70.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 23.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.16 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | July 5, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ADSK and FTV, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ADSK | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 29.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 2.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 17.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 17.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 4.33 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 19.26 |
Dividend Comparison
ADSK offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while FTV provides a 0.46% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ADSK | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.68 and 0.99, both ADSK and FTV have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both ADSK (quick ratio 0.68) and FTV (quick ratio 0.78) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- ADSK shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FTV (at 10.46) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ADSK | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.38 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.46 |