ADSK vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and FOUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing FOUR’s 5.89 billion USD by roughly 10.63×.
With betas of 1.47 for ADSK and 1.80 for FOUR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ADSK | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Shift4 Payments, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Jared Isaacman |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 87.34 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 5.89 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.80 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | June 5, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ADSK and FOUR, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ADSK | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 27.08 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 1.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 1.70 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 7.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 12.47 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | -20.81 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 2.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 16.10 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor FOUR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADSK | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while FOUR at 1.36 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FOUR at 1.36 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ADSK at 0.98, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ADSK shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FOUR (at 3.05) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ADSK | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.36 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 3.58 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.58 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.05 |