ADSK vs. ANET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and ANET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET towers over ADSK with a market cap of 116.08 billion USD, roughly 1.85 times the 62.67 billion USD of its peer.
ADSK at 1.47 and ANET at 1.39 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ADSK | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Arista Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 92.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 116.08 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.473 | 1.387 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | June 6, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and ANET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ADSK and ANET, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ADSK | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 38.46 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 2.11 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 15.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 11.51 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 30.67 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 35.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 15.36 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 30.18 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor ANET pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ADSK | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and ANET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK posts a current ratio of 0.68 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to ANET, sitting at 3.93, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- ADSK’s quick ratio sits at 0.68 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, ANET lands at 3.31, with enough liquidity to spare.
- For ADSK and ANET, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | ADSK | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 3.93 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 3.31 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |