ADSK vs. AFRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and AFRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing AFRM’s 15.24 billion USD by roughly 4.11×.
AFRM carries a higher beta at 3.66, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ADSK remains steadier at 1.47.
| Symbol | ADSK | AFRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Affirm Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Max Roth Levchin |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 47.24 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 15.24 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 3.66 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | January 13, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and AFRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and AFRM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AFRM shows a negative P/E of -246.14, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ADSK at 56.64 trades on solid profitability.
- AFRM shows a negative forward PEG of -1.38, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ADSK at 4.08 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ADSK | AFRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | -246.14 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | -1.38 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 5.07 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 5.32 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 25.04 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 69.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 7.07 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 34.90 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor AFRM currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADSK | AFRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and AFRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while AFRM at 63.09 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas AFRM at 63.09 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ADSK shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but AFRM is in the red with interest coverage -0.24, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ADSK | AFRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 63.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 63.09 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 2.56 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -0.24 |