Seek Returns logo

ADP vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADP and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADPPWR
Company NameAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization125.17 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADP and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADP vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADPPWR
5-Day Price Return0.25%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return-4.27%9.04%
26-Week Price Return-0.30%29.23%
52-Week Price Return15.76%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return-1.22%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return4.44%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.40M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.62M1.19M
3-Month Volatility17.03%22.91%
Beta0.861.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADP

72.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

ADP’s Return on Equity of 72.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADP

19.84%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.84% places ADP in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADP

26.32%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.32% places ADP in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADPPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)72.62%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.30%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.84%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.32%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.37%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADP

1.05

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ADP’s Current Ratio of 1.05 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADP

1.41

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

ADP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.41 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADP

39.45

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

ADP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.45 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADPPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.051.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.051.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.410.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.4510.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADP vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADP vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADP

1.92%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

ADP’s Dividend Yield of 1.92% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADP

58.80%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

ADP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.80% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADPPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.92%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.80%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADP

30.59

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

ADP’s P/E Ratio of 30.59 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADP

6.07

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

ADP’s P/S Ratio of 6.07 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADP

20.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 20.23, ADP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADP vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADPPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.5957.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.072.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.237.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.4140.85