Seek Returns logo

ADP vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADP and HUBB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ADP’s market capitalization of 125.51 billion USD is substantially larger than HUBB’s 22.14 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.80 for ADP and 0.98 for HUBB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolADPHUBB
Company NameAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Hubbell Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesElectrical Equipment & Parts
CEOMaria BlackGerben W. Bakker
Price309.2 USD414.84 USD
Market Cap125.51 billion USD22.14 billion USD
Beta0.800.98
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 5, 1972
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADP and HUBB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADP vs. HUBB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ADP

76.78%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
76.78%
Q3
46.63%
Median
19.55%
Q1
6.99%
Min
-1.64%

In the upper quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry, ADP’s Return on Equity of 76.78% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HUBB

24.97%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
40.77%
Q3
24.97%
Median
9.16%
Q1
-21.24%
Min
-83.49%

HUBB’s Return on Equity of 24.97% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ADP

23.22%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
23.22%
Q3
18.16%
Median
9.93%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-1.94%

In the upper quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry, ADP’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.22% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

HUBB

15.01%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.65%
Q3
9.59%
Median
4.18%
Q1
-26.21%
Min
-64.66%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, HUBB’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.01% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ADP

19.79%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
30.46%
Q3
17.07%
Median
3.53%
Q1
0.98%
Min
-4.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.79% places ADP in the upper quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HUBB

14.29%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.17%
Median
3.30%
Q1
-100.73%
Min
-135.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.29% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ADP

17.38%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
19.92%
Q3
12.35%
Median
4.95%
Q1
2.59%
Min
-2.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% places ADP in the upper quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HUBB

19.78%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
19.88%
Q3
14.79%
Median
7.23%
Q1
-48.45%
Min
-140.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.78% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADPHUBB
Return on Equity (TTM)76.78%24.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.08%11.55%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)23.22%15.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.79%14.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.38%19.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.09%34.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ADP

1.02

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
2.01
Median
1.65
Q1
1.15
Min
1.02

ADP’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUBB

1.17

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.44
Median
2.63
Q1
1.95
Min
1.17

HUBB’s Current Ratio of 1.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ADP

0.73

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
0.73
Q3
0.70
Median
0.22
Q1
0.11
Min
0.02

ADP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Staffing & Employment Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HUBB

0.61

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.68
Median
0.61
Q1
0.47
Min
0.33

HUBB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.61 is typical for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ADP

7.90

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
7.90
Q3
7.90
Median
2.91
Q1
-0.32
Min
-1.17

ADP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.90 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Staffing & Employment Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HUBB

21.00

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
21.00
Q3
9.09
Median
3.12
Q1
-7.14
Min
-31.43

HUBB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.00 is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADPHUBB
Current Ratio (TTM)1.021.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.020.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.730.61
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.29
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.261.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.9021.00

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ADP and HUBB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ADP

1.95%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
5.58%
Q3
3.50%
Median
2.08%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

ADP’s Dividend Yield of 1.95% is consistent with its peers in the Staffing & Employment Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HUBB

1.25%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.81%
Q3
0.50%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.25%, HUBB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ADP

58.73%

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
161.25%
Q3
109.23%
Median
58.73%
Q1
15.69%
Min
0.00%

ADP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.73% is within the typical range for the Staffing & Employment Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HUBB

34.08%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
162.68%
Q3
20.84%
Median
4.65%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.08% is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADPHUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.95%1.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.73%34.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ADP

31.47

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
35.74
Q3
30.98
Median
20.51
Q1
15.65
Min
7.85

A P/E Ratio of 31.47 places ADP in the upper quartile for the Staffing & Employment Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HUBB

28.07

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
27.52
Q3
27.52
Median
24.22
Q1
20.08
Min
9.48

At 28.07, HUBB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ADP

3.56

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.89
Median
1.18
Q1
1.00
Min
0.39

ADP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.56 is exceptionally high for the Staffing & Employment Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

HUBB

2.09

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.30
Q3
4.04
Median
2.62
Q1
2.03
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ADP

6.21

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
2.09
Median
0.86
Q1
0.59
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.21, ADP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Staffing & Employment Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HUBB

3.96

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.76
Q3
5.66
Median
3.18
Q1
1.88
Min
0.31

HUBB’s P/S Ratio of 3.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ADP

21.49

Staffing & Employment Services Industry

Max
21.09
Q3
12.56
Median
3.17
Q1
1.96
Min
0.33

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Staffing & Employment Services industry.

HUBB

6.86

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
10.91
Q3
6.77
Median
3.73
Q1
1.80
Min
0.59

HUBB’s P/B Ratio of 6.86 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ADP vs. HUBB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Staffing & Employment Services and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADPHUBB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.4728.07
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.562.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.213.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)21.496.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.7728.74
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)20.5718.38
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.294.25