Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. KMB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and KMB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADMKMB
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyKimberly-Clark Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization29.18 billion USD44.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and KMB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. KMB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADMKMB
5-Day Price Return2.38%-0.10%
13-Week Price Return21.44%-5.35%
26-Week Price Return32.86%-1.55%
52-Week Price Return1.76%-7.11%
Month-to-Date Return12.09%6.93%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%1.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.59M2.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.45M2.42M
3-Month Volatility26.43%19.14%
Beta0.700.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADM

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KMB

216.14%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

In the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, KMB’s Return on Equity of 216.14% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

1.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KMB

12.87%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

KMB’s Net Profit Margin of 12.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

0.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KMB

16.21%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.21% places KMB in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMKMB
Return on Equity (TTM)4.96%216.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.08%14.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.33%12.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%16.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.37%36.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.42

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMB

0.77

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

KMB’s Current Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

0.41

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KMB

5.73

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.73, KMB operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADM

22.44

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KMB

14.18

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

KMB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.18 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMKMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.420.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.415.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.4414.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. KMB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADM vs. KMB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADM

3.37%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.37% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KMB

3.71%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

KMB’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADM

88.90%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.90% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KMB

67.61%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

KMB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 67.61% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMKMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.37%3.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.90%67.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADM

26.37

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

A P/E Ratio of 26.37 places ADM in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KMB

18.22

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

KMB’s P/E Ratio of 18.22 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADM

0.35

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KMB

2.34

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

KMB’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.13

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KMB

33.66

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 33.66, KMB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADM vs. KMB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMKMB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.3718.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.352.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.1333.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.9021.06