Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. CL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and CL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADMCL
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyColgate-Palmolive Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization29.18 billion USD69.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and CL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. CL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADMCL
5-Day Price Return2.38%1.65%
13-Week Price Return21.44%-6.20%
26-Week Price Return32.86%-1.94%
52-Week Price Return1.76%-15.51%
Month-to-Date Return12.09%2.62%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%-5.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.59M4.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.45M5.15M
3-Month Volatility26.43%17.03%
Beta0.700.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADM

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

1.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

0.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMCL
Return on Equity (TTM)4.96%679.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.08%17.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.33%14.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.37%60.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.42

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

0.41

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADM

22.44

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.420.89
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.4112.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.4420.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADM vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADM

3.37%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.37% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADM

88.90%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.90% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.37%2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.90%61.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADM

26.37

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

A P/E Ratio of 26.37 places ADM in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CL

24.14

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.14 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADM

0.35

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CL

3.51

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.13

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADM vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.3724.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.353.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.13104.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.9020.83