Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. BG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and BG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADMBG
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyBunge Global SA
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization29.89 billion USD16.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 2, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and BG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. BG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADMBG
5-Day Price Return5.26%-0.70%
13-Week Price Return15.22%8.99%
26-Week Price Return30.80%5.42%
52-Week Price Return5.71%-16.68%
Month-to-Date Return4.15%1.46%
Year-to-Date Return23.16%6.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.92M1.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.71M1.95M
3-Month Volatility24.50%30.66%
Beta0.700.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADM

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BG

12.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

BG’s Return on Equity of 12.96% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

1.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BG

2.71%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Net Profit Margin of 2.71% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

0.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BG

3.17%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

BG’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMBG
Return on Equity (TTM)4.96%12.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.08%5.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.33%2.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%3.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.37%6.27%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.42

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BG

2.07

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

BG’s Current Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

0.41

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BG

1.04

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

BG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADM

22.44

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BG

3.58

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.58 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMBG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.422.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.881.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.411.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.443.58

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. BG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADM vs. BG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADM

3.22%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BG

2.26%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADM

88.90%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.90% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BG

27.00%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.00% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMBG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.22%2.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.90%27.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADM

27.61

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

A P/E Ratio of 27.61 places ADM in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BG

11.97

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/E Ratio of 11.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADM

0.37

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BG

0.32

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.13

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BG

0.99

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

BG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ADM vs. BG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMBG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.6111.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.370.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.130.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.187.19