Seek Returns logo

ADI vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADI and QBTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ADI’s market capitalization of 121.92 billion USD is substantially larger than QBTS’s 5.19 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.00 for ADI and 1.48 for QBTS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolADIQBTS
Company NameAnalog Devices, Inc.D-Wave Quantum Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsComputer Hardware
CEOVincent T. RocheAlan E. Baratz
Price245.68 USD16.79 USD
Market Cap121.92 billion USD5.19 billion USD
Beta1.001.48
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980December 11, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADI and QBTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADI vs. QBTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ADI

5.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ADI’s Return on Equity of 5.22% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-227.95%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

QBTS has a negative Return on Equity of -227.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ADI

4.52%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ADI’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.52% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

QBTS

-22.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

QBTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -22.72%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ADI

18.65%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ADI’s Net Profit Margin of 18.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-617.83%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -617.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ADI

22.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.71% places ADI in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

QBTS

-332.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -332.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADIQBTS
Return on Equity (TTM)5.22%-227.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.87%-40.54%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.52%-22.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.65%-617.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.71%-332.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.84%83.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ADI

2.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ADI’s Current Ratio of 2.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QBTS

20.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ADI

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ADI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QBTS

0.04

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 is typical for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ADI

7.01

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

ADI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QBTS

-28.05

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -28.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADIQBTS
Current Ratio (TTM)2.0820.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.5120.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.150.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.252.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.01-28.05

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ADI and QBTS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ADI

1.55%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.55%, ADI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ADI

101.60%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.60% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADIQBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.55%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.60%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ADI

66.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

A P/E Ratio of 66.56 places ADI in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QBTS

-36.44

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

QBTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -36.44. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ADI

4.01

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

QBTS

1.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ADI

12.42

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ADI’s P/S Ratio of 12.42 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QBTS

242.82

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 242.82, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ADI

3.48

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

ADI’s P/B Ratio of 3.48 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QBTS

23.19

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

At 23.19, QBTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADI vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADIQBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)66.56-36.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.011.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.42242.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.4823.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.02-99.42
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)32.84-36.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.91228.95