Seek Returns logo

ADI vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADI and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ADI’s market capitalization of 121.92 billion USD is substantially larger than JBL’s 24.26 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.00 for ADI and 1.14 for JBL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolADIJBL
Company NameAnalog Devices, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOVincent T. RocheMichael Dastoor
Price245.68 USD226.01 USD
Market Cap121.92 billion USD24.26 billion USD
Beta1.001.14
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980May 3, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADI and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADI vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ADI

5.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ADI’s Return on Equity of 5.22% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

38.64%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ADI

4.52%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ADI’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.52% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

JBL

15.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ADI

18.65%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ADI’s Net Profit Margin of 18.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.02%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ADI

22.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.71% places ADI in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADIJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)5.22%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.87%3.10%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.52%15.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.65%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.71%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.84%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ADI

2.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ADI’s Current Ratio of 2.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

0.98

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ADI

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ADI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.59, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ADI

7.01

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

ADI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL

28.37

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 28.37 is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADIJBL
Current Ratio (TTM)2.080.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.510.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.212.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.150.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.251.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.0128.37

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ADI and JBL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ADI

1.55%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.55%, ADI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

JBL

0.14%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ADI

101.60%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ADI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.60% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

JBL

6.59%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADIJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.55%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.60%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ADI

66.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

A P/E Ratio of 66.56 places ADI in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JBL

43.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 43.17 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ADI

4.01

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

JBL

2.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ADI

12.42

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ADI’s P/S Ratio of 12.42 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL

0.85

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ADI

3.48

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

ADI’s P/B Ratio of 3.48 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

19.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 19.38, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADI vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADIJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)66.5643.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.012.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)12.420.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.4819.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)37.0219.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)32.8424.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)12.910.91