ADBE vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADBE and IONQ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADBE dominates in value with a market cap of 176.46 billion USD, eclipsing IONQ’s 8.31 billion USD by roughly 21.23×.
IONQ carries a higher beta at 2.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ADBE remains steadier at 1.55.
| Symbol | ADBE | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Adobe Inc. | IonQ, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Shantanu Narayen | Mr. Niccolo Mcleod de Masi |
| Price | 414.03 USD | 33.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 176.46 billion USD | 8.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.55 | 2.46 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | August 13, 1986 | January 4, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADBE and IONQ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADBE and IONQ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- IONQ shows a negative P/E of -23.66, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ADBE at 26.74 trades on solid profitability.
- IONQ reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -42.42, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ADBE at 19.22 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ADBE | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 26.74 | -23.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.48 | 8.08 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.01 | 193.01 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 13.79 | 10.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.22 | -42.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 19.28 | -34.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.00 | 189.71 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 19.20 | -41.70 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADBE nor IONQ currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADBE | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADBE and IONQ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADBE (at 51.93) covers its interest payments, while IONQ shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | ADBE | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.18 | 13.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.18 | 12.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.50 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 51.93 | -- |