ADBE vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADBE and CLSK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADBE dominates in value with a market cap of 176.46 billion USD, eclipsing CLSK’s 2.84 billion USD by roughly 62.13×.
CLSK carries a higher beta at 4.37, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ADBE remains steadier at 1.55.
| Symbol | ADBE | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Adobe Inc. | CleanSpark, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Shantanu Narayen | Mr. Zachary K. Bradford CPA |
| Price | 414.03 USD | 10.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 176.46 billion USD | 2.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.55 | 4.37 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | August 13, 1986 | November 16, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADBE and CLSK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADBE and CLSK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CLSK shows a negative P/E of -15.82, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ADBE at 26.74 trades on solid profitability.
- CLSK shows a negative forward PEG of -0.10, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ADBE at 2.48 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- CLSK reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -2.60, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ADBE at 19.22 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ADBE | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 26.74 | -15.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.48 | -0.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.01 | 5.29 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 13.79 | 1.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.22 | -2.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 19.28 | 60.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.00 | 5.11 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 19.20 | -2.52 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADBE nor CLSK currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADBE | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADBE and CLSK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADBE meets its interest obligations (ratio 51.93). In stark contrast, CLSK’s negative ratio (-144.91) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ADBE | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.18 | 8.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.18 | 8.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.22 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 51.93 | -144.91 |