Seek Returns logo

ACN vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACN and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ACN is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolACNSONY
Company NameAccenture plcSony Group Corporation
CountryIrelandJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryIT ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization159.48 billion USD169.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 2001February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACN and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACN vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACNSONY
5-Day Price Return0.07%0.91%
13-Week Price Return-19.09%15.52%
26-Week Price Return-34.38%23.78%
52-Week Price Return-22.54%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return-4.14%14.64%
Year-to-Date Return-27.22%25.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.06M16.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.60M14.24M
3-Month Volatility28.52%30.48%
Beta1.301.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACN

27.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, ACN’s Return on Equity of 27.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

11.61%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.61% places ACN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

15.38%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.38% places ACN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACNSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)27.11%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.30%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.61%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.38%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.07%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

1.46

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

ACN’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

0.17

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

ACN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACN

4,205.92

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 4,205.92, ACN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the IT Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACNSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.461.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.461.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,205.92104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACN vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACN vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACN

2.24%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.24%, ACN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACN

45.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.12% is within the typical range for the IT Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACNSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.24%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.12%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACN

20.18

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

ACN’s P/E Ratio of 20.18 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACN

2.34

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

ACN’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

6.44

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

ACN’s P/B Ratio of 6.44 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ACN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACNSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.1822.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.342.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.442.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.6612.66