ACN vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACN and RBLX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ACN dominates in value with a market cap of 198.90 billion USD, eclipsing RBLX’s 55.05 billion USD by roughly 3.61×.
With betas of 1.34 for ACN and 1.47 for RBLX, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ACN | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Accenture plc | Roblox Corporation |
| Country | IE | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Ms. Julie T. Spellman Sweet J.D. | Mr. David Baszucki |
| Price | 317.72 USD | 81.16 USD |
| Market Cap | 198.90 billion USD | 55.05 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.34 | 1.47 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 2001 | March 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACN and RBLX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and RBLX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- RBLX shows a negative P/E of -61.96, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ACN at 25.92 trades on solid profitability.
| Symbol | ACN | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.92 | -61.96 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.75 | 1.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.96 | 14.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.81 | 175.46 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.41 | 62.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.76 | -90.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.95 | 14.52 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.36 | 63.51 |
Dividend Comparison
ACN delivers a 1.80% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas RBLX appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ACN | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and RBLX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- RBLX is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 5.81), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ACN at 0.28, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ACN meets its interest obligations (ratio 79.65). In stark contrast, RBLX’s negative ratio (-25.09) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ACN | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | 5.81 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 79.65 | -25.09 |