ACN vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACN and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ACN dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 198.90 billion USD—about 44.86 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
ACN rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.34, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.
| Symbol | ACN | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Accenture plc | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
| Country | IE | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Ms. Julie T. Spellman Sweet J.D. | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
| Price | 317.72 USD | 15.36 USD |
| Market Cap | 198.90 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.344 | 0.886 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 2001 | December 11, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACN and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ACN at 25.92 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ACN at 20.41 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | ACN | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.92 | -33.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.75 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.96 | 207.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.81 | 21.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.41 | -84.98 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.76 | -30.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.95 | 193.69 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.36 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
ACN’s 1.80% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike QBTS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ACN’s balanced approach against QBTS’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ACN | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, ACN at 79.65 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | ACN | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 20.73 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 20.61 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 79.65 | -28.05 |