Seek Returns logo

ACN vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACN and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACNNTAP
Company NameAccenture plcNetApp, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization158.86 billion USD21.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 19, 2001November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACN and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACN vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACNNTAP
5-Day Price Return3.61%-1.04%
13-Week Price Return-20.14%6.79%
26-Week Price Return-34.52%-7.91%
52-Week Price Return-22.58%-17.68%
Month-to-Date Return-4.51%4.12%
Year-to-Date Return-27.50%-6.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.84M1.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M1.92M
3-Month Volatility28.16%23.33%
Beta1.301.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACN

27.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, ACN’s Return on Equity of 27.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

11.61%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.61% places ACN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

15.38%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.38% places ACN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACNNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)27.11%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.30%12.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.61%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.38%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.07%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

1.46

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

ACN’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

0.17

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

ACN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACN

4,205.92

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 4,205.92, ACN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the IT Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACNNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.461.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.461.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.173.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,205.9217.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACN vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACN vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACN

2.24%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.24%, ACN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACN

45.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.12% is within the typical range for the IT Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACNNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.24%1.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.12%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACN

20.18

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

ACN’s P/E Ratio of 20.18 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACN

2.34

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

ACN’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

6.44

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

ACN’s P/B Ratio of 6.44 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACNNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.1818.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.343.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.4417.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.6616.19