Seek Returns logo

ACN vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACN and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACNGRMN
Company NameAccenture plcGarmin Ltd.
CountryIrelandSwitzerland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryIT ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization154.36 billion USD49.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 2001December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACN and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACN vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACNGRMN
5-Day Price Return0.64%4.64%
13-Week Price Return-17.43%20.15%
26-Week Price Return-20.86%18.42%
52-Week Price Return-31.30%52.33%
Month-to-Date Return0.64%4.64%
Year-to-Date Return-29.46%24.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.67M0.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.45M0.87M
3-Month Volatility26.64%25.44%
Beta1.271.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACN

25.56%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, ACN’s Return on Equity of 25.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

11.02%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.02% places ACN in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACN

14.68%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

ACN’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.68% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACNGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)25.56%19.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.36%16.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.02%23.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.68%26.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.91%58.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

1.42

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

ACN’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

0.17

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

ACN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACN

4,205.92

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 4,205.92, ACN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the IT Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACNGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.423.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.421.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,205.9273.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACN vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACN vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACN

2.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.44%, ACN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GRMN

1.22%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACN

48.19%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 48.19% is within the typical range for the IT Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACNGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.44%1.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)48.19%38.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACN

19.75

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

ACN’s P/E Ratio of 19.75 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN

31.71

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 31.71 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACN

2.18

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

ACN’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRMN

7.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 7.36, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACN

5.19

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

ACN’s P/B Ratio of 5.19 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACN vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACNGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.7531.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.187.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.194.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.9444.14