ACN vs. CRDO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACN and CRDO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ACN dominates in value with a market cap of 198.90 billion USD, eclipsing CRDO’s 10.26 billion USD by roughly 19.38×.
CRDO carries a higher beta at 2.29, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ACN remains steadier at 1.34.
Symbol | ACN | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Accenture plc | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd |
Country | IE | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment |
CEO | Ms. Julie T. Spellman Sweet J.D. | Mr. William J. Brennan |
Price | 317.72 USD | 60.45 USD |
Market Cap | 198.90 billion USD | 10.26 billion USD |
Beta | 1.34 | 2.29 |
Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | July 19, 2001 | January 27, 2022 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACN and CRDO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and CRDO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CRDO features a high P/E of 1986.26, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to ACN at 25.92, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
- CRDO reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -424.45, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ACN at 20.41 maintains positive cash flow.
Symbol | ACN | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.92 | 1986.26 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.75 | 74.87 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.96 | 31.34 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.81 | 16.44 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.41 | -424.45 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.76 | 1084.70 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.95 | 30.47 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.36 | -412.74 |
Dividend Comparison
ACN delivers a 1.80% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas CRDO appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
Symbol | ACN | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and CRDO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ACN (at 79.65) covers its interest payments, while CRDO shows “--” for minimal debt service.
Symbol | ACN | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 7.67 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 7.01 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | 0.03 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 79.65 | -- |