ACN vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ACN dominates in value with a market cap of 198.90 billion USD, eclipsing CLSK’s 2.84 billion USD by roughly 70.03×.

CLSK carries a higher beta at 4.37, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ACN remains steadier at 1.34.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ACN and CLSK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and CLSK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• CLSK shows a negative P/E of -15.82, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ACN at 25.92 trades on solid profitability.
• CLSK shows a negative forward PEG of -0.10, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ACN at 2.75 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
• CLSK reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -2.60, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ACN at 20.41 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

ACN delivers a 1.80% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas CLSK appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and CLSK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• ACN meets its interest obligations (ratio 79.65). In stark contrast, CLSK’s negative ratio (-144.91) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.