Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ACM is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolACMZTO
Company NameAECOMZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization15.91 billion USD15.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMZTO
5-Day Price Return-1.02%-1.28%
13-Week Price Return10.42%13.58%
26-Week Price Return16.36%1.98%
52-Week Price Return25.20%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return7.12%1.84%
Year-to-Date Return13.06%2.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M3.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M2.52M
3-Month Volatility18.47%39.66%
Beta1.040.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

26.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 26.79% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZTO

15.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

3.82%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZTO

20.76%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.38%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.38% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

25.33%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)26.79%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%10.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%20.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.38%25.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.34%29.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.17

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.05

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.05 falls into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.27

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

6.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.171.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.010.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.76--

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACM vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

0.81%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 0.81% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

21.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.01% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.81%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

26.07

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 26.07 places ACM in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZTO

12.01

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

1.00

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTO

2.49

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.49, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.99

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 5.99, ACM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZTO

1.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.82 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0712.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.002.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.991.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.399.58