Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

VRSK’s market capitalization of 42.53 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.97 for ACM and 0.88 for VRSK, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolACMVRSK
Company NameAecomVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionConsulting Services
CEOW. Troy RuddLee M. Shavel
Price115.75 USD304.06 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD42.53 billion USD
Beta0.970.88
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2007October 7, 2009
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRSK

407.47%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
26.22%
Q3
25.78%
Median
23.70%
Q1
12.26%
Min
8.67%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 407.47% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consulting Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VRSK

23.05%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
33.93%
Q3
19.78%
Median
12.27%
Q1
8.32%
Min
5.66%

In the upper quartile for the Consulting Services industry, VRSK’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.05% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRSK

33.13%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
14.78%
Median
7.88%
Q1
6.68%
Min
5.45%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 33.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consulting Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.56%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
34.23%
Q3
21.10%
Median
10.99%
Q1
9.29%
Min
8.13%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Consulting Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%407.47%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%18.95%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%23.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%33.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%43.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%66.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

VRSK

1.27

Consulting Services Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.20
Median
1.69
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Consulting Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

31.99

Consulting Services Industry

Max
1.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.17
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 31.99, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Consulting Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

9.67

Consulting Services Industry

Max
45.92
Q3
30.67
Median
10.52
Q1
7.67
Min
3.02

VRSK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consulting Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMVRSK
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.27
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.3231.99
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.77
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.231.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.289.67

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and VRSK. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VRSK

0.55%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
2.06%
Q3
0.84%
Median
0.54%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Consulting Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VRSK

23.54%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
55.92%
Q3
28.27%
Median
23.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.54% is within the typical range for the Consulting Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%0.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%23.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

43.94

Consulting Services Industry

Max
51.91
Q3
40.33
Median
21.50
Q1
17.51
Min
10.23

A P/E Ratio of 43.94 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Consulting Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

VRSK

3.20

Consulting Services Industry

Max
4.82
Q3
3.61
Median
2.04
Q1
1.65
Min
0.72

VRSK’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.20 is within the middle range of its peers in the Consulting Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

14.51

Consulting Services Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
4.77
Median
1.83
Q1
1.28
Min
0.77

With a P/S Ratio of 14.51, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consulting Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

346.81

Consulting Services Industry

Max
8.62
Q3
6.18
Median
4.55
Q1
2.94
Min
1.61

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Consulting Services industry.

ACM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8443.94
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.513.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.9514.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.71346.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3142.79
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5128.50
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.0415.48