Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UPS’s market capitalization of 88.18 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.97 for ACM and 1.19 for UPS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolACMUPS
Company NameAecomUnited Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionIntegrated Freight & Logistics
CEOW. Troy RuddCarol B. Tome
Price115.75 USD104.13 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD88.18 billion USD
Beta0.971.19
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2007November 10, 1999
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.35%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
37.37%
Q3
30.76%
Median
15.30%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-26.64%

In the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

UPS

12.11%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.03%
Q3
12.11%
Median
8.38%
Q1
2.55%
Min
0.79%

UPS’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.11% is in line with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UPS

6.44%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.64%
Q3
4.86%
Median
3.72%
Q1
0.61%
Min
0.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.44% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UPS

9.36%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.80%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.93%
Q1
3.63%
Min
0.83%

UPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.36% is around the midpoint for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%35.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%8.55%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%6.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%9.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%19.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

UPS

1.09

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.36
Median
1.13
Q1
1.02
Min
0.78

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the median group of the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UPS

1.63

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.69
Median
0.45
Q1
0.24
Min
0.16

UPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.63 is typical for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPS

9.53

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
19.14
Q3
12.59
Median
6.24
Q1
1.76
Min
0.11

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMUPS
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.09
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.09
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.321.63
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.231.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.289.53

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and UPS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UPS

6.28%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.46%
Q3
2.50%
Median
1.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.28%, UPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UPS

92.20%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
92.20%
Q3
43.42%
Median
30.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 92.20% is in the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%6.28%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%92.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UPS

15.11

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
38.34
Q3
27.03
Median
21.39
Q1
15.71
Min
10.86

In the lower quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 15.11 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

UPS

1.15

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.72
Median
1.10
Q1
0.87
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UPS

0.97

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.22
Q3
1.42
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.30

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UPS

5.65

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
9.09
Q3
5.80
Median
3.47
Q1
1.54
Min
0.57

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.65 is within the conventional range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8415.11
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.511.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.950.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.715.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3116.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.519.12
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.041.20