Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ACM is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolACMRTO
Company NameAECOMRentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization15.91 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMRTO
5-Day Price Return-1.02%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return10.42%3.18%
26-Week Price Return16.36%-12.52%
52-Week Price Return25.20%-24.83%
Month-to-Date Return7.12%-4.27%
Year-to-Date Return13.06%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M4.20M
3-Month Volatility18.47%31.78%
Beta1.040.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

26.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 26.79% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

3.82%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.38%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.38% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)26.79%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.38%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.34%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.17

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

6.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.171.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.031.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.011.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.765.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACM vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

0.81%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 0.81% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

21.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.01% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.81%3.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.01%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

26.07

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 26.07 places ACM in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

1.00

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.99

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 5.99, ACM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0727.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.001.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.991.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.3913.32