ACM vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at ACM and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
RSG’s market capitalization of 75.36 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
ACM’s beta of 0.97 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RSG (beta: 0.64), suggesting ACM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
| Symbol | ACM | RSG |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aecom | Republic Services, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Waste Management |
| CEO | W. Troy Rudd | Jon Vander Ark |
| Price | 115.75 USD | 241.14 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.31 billion USD | 75.36 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.97 | 0.64 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2007 | July 1, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of ACM and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
ACM
27.52%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 39.77%
- Q3
- 28.08%
- Median
- 13.64%
- Q1
- 7.13%
- Min
- -14.48%
ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
RSG
18.40%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 40.07%
- Q3
- 22.07%
- Median
- 11.65%
- Q1
- -3.10%
- Min
- -27.58%
RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.40% is on par with the norm for the Waste Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Return on Invested Capital
ACM
6.55%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 22.01%
- Q3
- 12.65%
- Median
- 8.09%
- Q1
- 4.79%
- Min
- -2.53%
ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.
RSG
9.07%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 9.07%
- Q3
- 7.95%
- Median
- 3.52%
- Q1
- 1.30%
- Min
- -4.75%
In the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, RSG’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.07% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.
Net Profit Margin
ACM
3.85%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 11.23%
- Q3
- 6.47%
- Median
- 3.96%
- Q1
- 2.79%
- Min
- -2.45%
ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
RSG
12.88%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 12.88%
- Q3
- 11.97%
- Median
- 6.76%
- Q1
- -0.76%
- Min
- -9.89%
A Net Profit Margin of 12.88% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin
ACM
5.98%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 13.74%
- Q3
- 8.50%
- Median
- 6.20%
- Q1
- 4.58%
- Min
- 0.34%
ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
RSG
20.22%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 20.22%
- Q3
- 13.63%
- Median
- 7.87%
- Q1
- 1.29%
- Min
- -5.01%
An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | ACM | RSG |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 27.52% | 18.40% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 5.24% | 6.30% |
| Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | 6.55% | 9.07% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.85% | 12.88% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.98% | 20.22% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.09% | 36.53% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
ACM
--
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 1.66
- Median
- 1.38
- Q1
- 1.24
- Min
- 0.94
Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.
RSG
0.66
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.79
- Min
- 0.66
RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Waste Management industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
ACM
1.32
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.91
- Median
- 0.67
- Q1
- 0.28
- Min
- 0.01
ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
RSG
1.16
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 2.64
- Q3
- 1.57
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.87
- Min
- 0.07
RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.16 is typical for the Waste Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio
ACM
5.28
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 20.20
- Q3
- 11.91
- Median
- 6.46
- Q1
- 3.18
- Min
- -2.69
ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
RSG
6.06
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 6.06
- Q3
- 5.49
- Median
- 2.34
- Q1
- 0.26
- Min
- -2.04
RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | ACM | RSG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | -- | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | -- | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.32 | 1.16 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 1.23 | 2.75 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 5.28 | 6.06 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and RSG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
ACM
0.86%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 1.31%
- Q3
- 0.40%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
RSG
0.96%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 1.38%
- Q3
- 0.73%
- Median
- 0.06%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 0.96%, RSG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Waste Management industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
Dividend Payout Ratio
ACM
20.16%
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 32.30%
- Q3
- 7.09%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
RSG
33.57%
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 49.31%
- Q3
- 43.13%
- Median
- 17.31%
- Q1
- 0.26%
- Min
- 0.00%
RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.57% is within the typical range for the Waste Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | ACM | RSG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.86% | 0.96% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 20.16% | 33.57% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
ACM
24.84
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 95.41
- Q3
- 56.70
- Median
- 32.28
- Q1
- 22.94
- Min
- 4.72
ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
RSG
36.21
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 76.31
- Q3
- 66.40
- Median
- 35.51
- Q1
- 32.40
- Min
- 9.07
RSG’s P/E Ratio of 36.21 is within the middle range for the Waste Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
ACM
2.51
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 4.99
- Q3
- 3.64
- Median
- 2.51
- Q1
- 1.64
- Min
- 0.03
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.
RSG
3.71
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 6.52
- Q3
- 4.74
- Median
- 2.97
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.06
RSG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.71 is within the middle range of its peers in the Waste Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
ACM
0.95
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 3.34
- Q3
- 2.05
- Median
- 1.50
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.44
ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
RSG
4.66
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 5.29
- Q3
- 4.49
- Median
- 3.59
- Q1
- 1.82
- Min
- 0.31
RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.66 is in the upper echelon for the Waste Management industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio
ACM
6.71
Engineering & Construction Industry
- Max
- 10.70
- Q3
- 7.33
- Median
- 4.69
- Q1
- 2.53
- Min
- 0.79
ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
RSG
6.47
Waste Management Industry
- Max
- 10.62
- Q3
- 6.13
- Median
- 4.78
- Q1
- 2.85
- Min
- 1.68
RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.47 is in the upper tier for the Waste Management industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | ACM | RSG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.84 | 36.21 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.51 | 3.71 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.95 | 4.66 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.71 | 6.47 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.31 | 32.07 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.51 | 18.15 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.04 | 5.49 |