Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ACM is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolACMPAC
Company NameAECOMGrupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization15.91 billion USD12.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMPAC
5-Day Price Return-1.02%-2.95%
13-Week Price Return10.42%-0.18%
26-Week Price Return16.36%13.31%
52-Week Price Return25.20%51.23%
Month-to-Date Return7.12%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return13.06%25.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M0.69M
3-Month Volatility18.47%24.54%
Beta1.041.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

26.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 26.79% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

3.82%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.38%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.38% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)26.79%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.38%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.34%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.17

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

6.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.170.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.012.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.765.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

0.81%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 0.81% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

21.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.01% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.81%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.01%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

26.07

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 26.07 places ACM in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

1.00

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.99

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 5.99, ACM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0719.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.004.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.999.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.3918.23