Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. ODFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and ODFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ODFL’s market capitalization of 36.14 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.97 for ACM and 1.27 for ODFL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolACMODFL
Company NameAecomOld Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionTrucking
CEOW. Troy RuddKevin M. Freeman
Price115.75 USD171.03 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD36.14 billion USD
Beta0.971.27
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2007October 24, 1991
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and ODFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. ODFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ODFL

27.40%

Trucking Industry

Max
27.40%
Q3
13.41%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.91%
Min
-3.46%

In the upper quartile for the Trucking industry, ODFL’s Return on Equity of 27.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ODFL

23.06%

Trucking Industry

Max
10.76%
Q3
8.53%
Median
3.70%
Q1
1.79%
Min
-2.53%

ODFL’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trucking industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ODFL

20.04%

Trucking Industry

Max
4.81%
Q3
4.61%
Median
2.88%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.60%

ODFL’s Net Profit Margin of 20.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trucking industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ODFL

26.10%

Trucking Industry

Max
13.40%
Q3
8.09%
Median
4.17%
Q1
2.19%
Min
-1.98%

ODFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Trucking industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMODFL
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%27.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%20.91%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%23.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%20.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%26.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%33.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

ODFL

1.32

Trucking Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.45
Median
1.24
Q1
1.03
Min
0.88

ODFL’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Trucking industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ODFL

0.01

Trucking Industry

Max
0.63
Q3
0.50
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trucking industry, ODFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ODFL

8,449.87

Trucking Industry

Max
34.42
Q3
21.52
Median
3.73
Q1
1.68
Min
-2.10

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8,449.87, ODFL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trucking industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMODFL
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.32
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.320.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.23-0.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.288449.87

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and ODFL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ODFL

0.63%

Trucking Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.69%
Median
1.22%
Q1
0.65%
Min
0.00%

ODFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is in the lower quartile for the Trucking industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ODFL

19.72%

Trucking Industry

Max
195.49%
Q3
55.74%
Median
19.72%
Q1
9.76%
Min
0.00%

ODFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.72% is within the typical range for the Trucking industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMODFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%19.72%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ODFL

31.63

Trucking Industry

Max
48.87
Q3
44.85
Median
26.67
Q1
17.49
Min
8.11

ODFL’s P/E Ratio of 31.63 is within the middle range for the Trucking industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

ODFL

2.30

Trucking Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.08
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.14

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Trucking industry.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ODFL

6.31

Trucking Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
1.02
Median
0.75
Q1
0.57
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 6.31, ODFL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trucking industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ODFL

8.58

Trucking Industry

Max
3.14
Q3
1.98
Median
1.41
Q1
1.15
Min
0.84

At 8.58, ODFL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trucking industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACM vs. ODFL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMODFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8431.63
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.512.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.956.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.718.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3143.44
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5119.49
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.046.30