Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

LMT’s market capitalization of 108.37 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ACM’s beta of 0.97 points to significantly higher volatility compared to LMT (beta: 0.29), suggesting ACM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolACMLMT
Company NameAecomLockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionAerospace & Defense
CEOW. Troy RuddJames D. Taiclet Jr.
Price115.75 USD462.52 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD108.37 billion USD
Beta0.970.29
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2007January 3, 1977
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LMT

83.41%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
42.57%
Q3
16.67%
Median
8.39%
Q1
-0.77%
Min
-23.36%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 83.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

LMT

17.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
-5.60%
Min
-22.46%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s Return on Invested Capital of 17.14% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT

7.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.67%
Q3
8.04%
Median
4.95%
Q1
-5.07%
Min
-16.58%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

10.34%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
11.49%
Median
8.96%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-4.96%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.34% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%83.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%9.71%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%17.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%7.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%10.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%10.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

LMT

1.08

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.36
Median
2.16
Q1
1.20
Min
0.41

LMT’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LMT

3.04

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.73
Median
0.51
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.04, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT

7.08

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.38
Median
2.95
Q1
1.68
Min
-6.68

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMLMT
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.08
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.91
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.323.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.36
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.232.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.287.08

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and LMT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LMT

2.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
6.00%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.82%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LMT

55.88%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
172.02%
Q3
32.47%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.88% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%2.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%55.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT

19.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
75.34
Q3
54.40
Median
38.63
Q1
26.10
Min
16.44

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/E Ratio of 19.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

LMT

5.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
10.68
Q3
5.36
Median
2.31
Q1
1.47
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 5.49 places LMT in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT

1.51

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
19.34
Q3
9.54
Median
2.71
Q1
1.59
Min
0.35

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.51 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT

16.22

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.08
Q3
8.12
Median
4.12
Q1
2.69
Min
0.69

At 16.22, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACM vs. LMT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8419.70
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.515.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.951.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.7116.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3121.74
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5113.98
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.041.77