Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. KBR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and KBR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACMKBR
Company NameAECOMKBR, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringProfessional Services
Market Capitalization17.15 billion USD6.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007November 16, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and KBR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. KBR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMKBR
5-Day Price Return-0.73%0.34%
13-Week Price Return12.21%1.04%
26-Week Price Return37.61%-4.97%
52-Week Price Return26.27%-28.50%
Month-to-Date Return-0.73%0.34%
Year-to-Date Return21.25%-18.09%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.89M1.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.95M1.38M
3-Month Volatility20.99%24.44%
Beta1.050.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

26.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 26.79% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KBR

24.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

KBR’s Return on Equity of 24.91% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

3.82%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KBR

4.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

KBR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.38%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.38% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KBR

8.72%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

KBR’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMKBR
Return on Equity (TTM)26.79%24.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%5.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%4.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.38%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.34%14.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.17

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KBR

1.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

KBR’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KBR

1.76

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

KBR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Professional Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.76. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

6.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KBR

14.81

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

KBR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMKBR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.171.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.031.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.011.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.7614.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. KBR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACM vs. KBR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

0.75%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 0.75% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KBR

1.32%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

KBR’s Dividend Yield of 1.32% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

21.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.01% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KBR

22.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

KBR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMKBR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.75%1.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.01%22.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

27.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 27.88 places ACM in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KBR

16.84

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, KBR’s P/E Ratio of 16.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

1.06

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KBR

0.76

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, KBR’s P/S Ratio of 0.76 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.99

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 5.99 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KBR

4.15

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

KBR’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. KBR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMKBR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.8816.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.060.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.994.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7414.64