Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. ITW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and ITW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ITW’s market capitalization of 75.74 billion USD is significantly greater than ACM’s 15.31 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.97 for ACM and 1.12 for ITW, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolACMITW
Company NameAecomIllinois Tool Works Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionIndustrial - Machinery
CEOW. Troy RuddChristopher A. O'Herlihy
Price115.75 USD258.5 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD75.74 billion USD
Beta0.971.12
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2007March 13, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and ITW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. ITW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ITW

104.39%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

ITW’s Return on Equity of 104.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ITW

25.61%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

ITW’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITW

21.37%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.37% places ITW in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITW

25.93%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.93% places ITW in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMITW
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%104.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%21.78%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%25.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%21.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%25.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%43.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

ITW

1.60

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

ITW’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ITW

2.55

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, ITW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial - Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITW

14.60

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

ITW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMITW
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.60
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.322.55
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.53
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.231.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2814.60

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and ITW. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ITW

2.32%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.32%, ITW offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ITW

50.96%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ITW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.96% is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMITW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%2.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%50.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITW

22.53

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

ITW’s P/E Ratio of 22.53 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

ITW

3.97

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITW

4.80

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

ITW’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITW

23.42

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

At 23.42, ITW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACM vs. ITW: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMITW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8422.53
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.513.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.954.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.7123.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3126.61
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5116.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.045.27