Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACMGPN
Company NameAECOMGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringFinancial Services
Market Capitalization15.91 billion USD20.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMGPN
5-Day Price Return-1.02%-1.63%
13-Week Price Return10.42%6.09%
26-Week Price Return16.36%-17.63%
52-Week Price Return25.20%-21.96%
Month-to-Date Return7.12%7.28%
Year-to-Date Return13.06%-23.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M2.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M3.19M
3-Month Volatility18.47%37.85%
Beta1.041.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

26.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 26.79% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

3.82%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.38%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.38% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)26.79%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.13%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.38%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.34%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.17

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

6.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.170.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.010.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.765.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACM vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

0.81%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 0.81% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

21.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.01% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.81%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.01%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

26.07

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 26.07 places ACM in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

1.00

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.99

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 5.99, ACM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0714.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.002.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.990.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.396.69