Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. FTAI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and FTAI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ACM’s market capitalization stands at 15.31 billion USD, while FTAI’s is 11.79 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

FTAI carries a higher beta at 1.68, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ACM (beta: 0.97) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolACMFTAI
Company NameAecomFTAI Aviation Ltd.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionRental & Leasing Services
CEOW. Troy RuddJoseph P. Adams Jr.
Price115.75 USD114.95 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD11.79 billion USD
Beta0.971.68
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2007May 14, 2015
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and FTAI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. FTAI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTAI

79.25%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

FTAI’s Return on Equity of 79.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FTAI

14.62%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

In the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, FTAI’s Return on Invested Capital of 14.62% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTAI

3.08%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

FTAI’s Net Profit Margin of 3.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTAI

38.22%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 38.22% places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMFTAI
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%79.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%1.38%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%14.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%3.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%38.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%40.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

FTAI

3.95

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

FTAI’s Current Ratio of 3.95 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTAI

--

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for FTAI is currently unavailable.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTAI

6.53

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

FTAI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.53 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMFTAI
Current Ratio (TTM)--3.95
Quick Ratio (TTM)--2.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.32--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.26--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.23-0.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.286.53

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and FTAI. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTAI

0.78%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FTAI

260.58%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 260.58% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMFTAI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%260.58%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTAI

199.79

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

At 199.79, FTAI’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

FTAI

8.71

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTAI

6.16

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

FTAI’s P/S Ratio of 6.16 is in the upper echelon for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTAI

416.07

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

At 416.07, FTAI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACM vs. FTAI: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Rental & Leasing Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMFTAI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.84199.79
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.518.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.956.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.71416.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.31-25.27
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5126.42
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.046.10