Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ACM’s market capitalization of 15.31 billion USD is substantially larger than FLR’s 8.69 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.97 for ACM and 1.30 for FLR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolACMFLR
Company NameAecomFluor Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & Construction
CEOW. Troy RuddJames R. Breuer
Price115.75 USD52.76 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD8.69 billion USD
Beta0.971.30
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2007December 1, 2000
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLR

61.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 61.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROE against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FLR

-0.10%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

FLR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROIC against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

11.14%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.14% places FLR in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

3.03%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.03% is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%61.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%21.90%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%-0.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%11.14%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%3.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%3.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

FLR

1.74

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLR

0.30

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR

11.16

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

FLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMFLR
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.74
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.320.30
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.13
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.23-2.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2811.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and FLR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

4.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 4.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

FLR

0.41

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR

0.52

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.52 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLR

2.49

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ACM vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Engineering & Construction industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.844.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.510.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.950.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.712.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3116.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5112.10
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.040.44