Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

ACM vs. BAH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at ACM and BAH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACMBAH
Company NameAECOMBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringProfessional Services
GICS Sub-IndustryConstruction & EngineeringResearch & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization10.65 billion USD9.33 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2007November 18, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

ACM’s market capitalization stands at 10.65 billion USD, while BAH’s is 9.33 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and BAH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM+27.20%
BAH+2.61%
ACM vs. BAH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
5-Day Price Return-3.78%-6.43%
13-Week Price Return-14.17%-17.22%
26-Week Price Return-37.96%-19.70%
52-Week Price Return-12.35%-32.80%
Month-to-Date Return-2.86%-0.85%
Year-to-Date Return-13.57%-8.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.04M1.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.41M2.44M
3-Month Volatility38.86%49.59%
Beta1.010.32

ACM’s beta of 1.01 points to significantly higher volatility compared to BAH (beta: 0.32), suggesting ACM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACM

19.75%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
33.62%
Q3
18.81%
Median
12.09%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-5.35%

In the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, ACM’s Return on Equity of 19.75% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAH

82.04%

Professional Services Industry
Max
40.94%
Q3
34.75%
Median
24.62%
Q1
13.36%
Min
-2.68%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 82.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

2.94%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
11.65%
Q3
7.23%
Median
4.04%
Q1
2.37%
Min
-2.32%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 2.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAH

7.35%

Professional Services Industry
Max
29.56%
Q3
16.56%
Median
9.62%
Q1
5.36%
Min
-2.21%

BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACM

6.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
18.45%
Q3
10.37%
Median
6.88%
Q1
4.25%
Min
-2.44%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.34% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAH

9.16%

Professional Services Industry
Max
43.25%
Q3
23.47%
Median
14.90%
Q1
9.29%
Min
2.22%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.16% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
Return on Equity (TTM)19.75%82.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.90%11.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.94%7.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.34%9.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%53.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.10

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
1.98
Q3
1.48
Median
1.22
Q1
1.05
Min
0.76

ACM’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAH

1.81

Professional Services Industry
Max
2.56
Q3
1.69
Median
1.25
Q1
1.05
Min
0.49

BAH’s Current Ratio of 1.81 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

1.21

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
2.37
Q3
1.23
Median
0.71
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

ACM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.21 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAH

3.84

Professional Services Industry
Max
3.07
Q3
1.64
Median
1.04
Q1
0.44
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.84, BAH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACM

10.70

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
33.75
Q3
16.20
Median
8.57
Q1
3.47
Min
-6.49

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.70 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAH

8.26

Professional Services Industry
Max
24.68
Q3
18.11
Median
9.63
Q1
5.75
Min
0.78

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.981.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.213.84
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.708.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-4.57%-10.19%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-1.62%-3.13%
3-Year Revenue CAGR7.07%12.72%
5-Year Revenue CAGR4.04%9.93%

EPS Growth

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-54.84%12.80%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)0.36%-15.84%
3-Year EPS CAGR24.67%28.19%
5-Year EPS CAGR--16.35%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACM

1.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
5.80%
Q3
2.55%
Median
1.38%
Q1
0.02%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAH

2.81%

Professional Services Industry
Max
5.19%
Q3
3.31%
Median
2.02%
Q1
1.24%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Yield of 2.81% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACM

29.79%

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
144.77%
Q3
63.32%
Median
44.43%
Q1
5.98%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.79% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAH

32.74%

Professional Services Industry
Max
99.60%
Q3
72.52%
Median
43.04%
Q1
20.51%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.74% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%2.81%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.79%32.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACM

22.84

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
56.37
Q3
32.05
Median
18.43
Q1
14.93
Min
3.06

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 22.84 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAH

11.65

Professional Services Industry
Max
34.61
Q3
23.88
Median
19.47
Q1
13.04
Min
6.63

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, BAH’s P/E Ratio of 11.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACM

0.67

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
4.00
Q3
1.93
Median
0.96
Q1
0.54
Min
0.11

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAH

0.86

Professional Services Industry
Max
6.34
Q3
3.49
Median
2.24
Q1
0.87
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, BAH’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACM

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry
Max
8.49
Q3
4.56
Median
2.13
Q1
1.46
Min
0.29

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAH

9.98

Professional Services Industry
Max
16.27
Q3
8.54
Median
5.88
Q1
3.11
Min
0.91

BAH’s P/B Ratio of 9.98 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ACM vs. BAH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMBAH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.8411.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.670.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.639.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.2610.46