ACHR vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACHR and VRT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
VRT stands out with 39.49 billion USD in market value—about 6.65× ACHR’s market cap of 5.94 billion USD.
ACHR’s beta of 3.13 points to much larger expected swings compared to VRT’s calmer 1.71, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ACHR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Archer Aviation Inc. | Vertiv Holdings Co |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Adam D. Goldstein | Mr. Giordano Albertazzi |
| Price | 10.82 USD | 103.61 USD |
| Market Cap | 5.94 billion USD | 39.49 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.13 | 1.71 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 18, 2020 | August 2, 2018 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACHR and VRT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACHR and VRT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ACHR posts a negative P/E of -8.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while VRT at 59.23 signals healthy earnings.
- ACHR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.16, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, VRT (P/FCF 30.29) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ACHR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -8.37 | 59.23 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.22 | 3.40 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 4.70 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.25 | 14.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -13.16 | 30.29 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -9.88 | 28.19 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -11.05 | 31.57 |
Dividend Comparison
ACHR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while VRT provides a 0.12% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ACHR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.12% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACHR and VRT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ACHR shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas VRT (at 10.65) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ACHR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 15.80 | 1.72 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 15.80 | 1.28 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 1.18 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.33 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.65 |