Seek Returns logo

ACHR vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACHR and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolACHRPWR
Company NameArcher Aviation Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization6.24 billion USD56.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 18, 2020February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACHR and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACHR vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolACHRPWR
5-Day Price Return-1.83%-0.91%
13-Week Price Return-10.63%11.31%
26-Week Price Return-9.37%32.08%
52-Week Price Return153.14%41.02%
Month-to-Date Return-3.59%-6.47%
Year-to-Date Return-0.82%20.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.22M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume35.44M1.18M
3-Month Volatility77.95%22.94%
Beta3.141.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ACHR

-62.65%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

ACHR has a negative Return on Equity of -62.65%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ACHR

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

Net Profit Margin data for ACHR is currently unavailable.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ACHR

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

Operating Profit Margin data for ACHR is currently unavailable.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACHRPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)-62.65%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)-51.01%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ACHR

22.30

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

ACHR’s Current Ratio of 22.30 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ACHR

0.04

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, ACHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ACHR

-346.80

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

ACHR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -346.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACHRPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)22.301.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)22.011.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.040.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-346.8010.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

ACHR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ACHR vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ACHR

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACHR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ACHR

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACHR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACHRPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ACHR

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for ACHR is currently unavailable.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ACHR

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

P/S Ratio data for ACHR is currently unavailable.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ACHR

4.09

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

ACHR’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ACHR vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACHRPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--57.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)--2.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.097.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--40.85